Achieving Maternal Health

By Adrienne Germain

This month, a study published in the The Lancet reported a decline in maternal mortality. While this is cause for optimism, we cannot afford to be complacent: more than 300,000 women still die senseless deaths and suffer disabilities each year due to preventable causes related to pregnancy and childbirth, and in some countries, maternal deaths are on the rise. Many of these girls and women give birth and die at home, often alone, in fear and agony. Or, they die in substandard medical facilities ill-equipped to deal with problems that are routinely managed for women in rich countries and for rich women in their own countries. Saving women's lives in childbirth requires relatively inexpensive and known interventions at the clinical level - not fancy hospitals, new technologies or scientific breakthroughs. This decline does give us reason to be optimistic, but with political will, we can and should continue to make maternal health a global priority. And we must also make it easier for women and girls to decide to use, and actually reach, these services.

With impetus from the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), specifically MDG 5, priorities are starting to shift and nations are beginning to pay more attention to women. Our mission, however, is not simply to reduce maternal deaths, but to achieve maternal health. Maternal health is a state of being. It cannot be achieved through a simple technical fix, nor through maternity care alone. Rather, we must also equip women with the information, skills and services to make informed decisions whether to become pregnant and to give birth. They must have access to safe, affordable contraceptives, including emergency contraception, and male and female condoms, especially where HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are prevalent. They must also have the choice of safe abortion. And they need prevention and treatment for the myriad of STIs that jeopardize not only their own health and lives, but those of the children they choose to bear.

Maternity care, contraception, safe abortion, prevention and treatment of STIs including HIV - these four, together with comprehensive sexuality education form the core sexual and reproductive rights and health (SRRH) package, which is required to ensure that women and young people can live just and healthy lives. Each of the five main elements of the package relies on the others to reach peak effectiveness. Focusing only on one element of this package without the others in concert is not only shortsighted, but a failure to respect women's realities. As we look at the function of each element, the justification for providing the complete package is clear, not only in terms of girls' and women's needs, but in terms of efficacy.

Knowledge is power - and a key element of the SRRH package. In Nicaragua, almost 90 percent of sexually active adolescents did not use contraception the first time they had sex simply because they were unaware that they could. Early, comprehensive sexuality education for girls and boys can help fill gaps in knowledge, empower young people to make healthy decisions, prevent unwanted pregnancies, reduce the risk of STIs, and encourage equal and balanced relationships based on respect for human rights and for consent.

The second element of the package is access to contraception. More than 200 million women who want to delay or prevent pregnancies lack the information or contraceptives needed to do so; and nearly half of the 205 million pregnancies that occur each year are unplanned. By making effective contraception affordable and accessible, we can help ensure that every pregnancy is wanted and reduce the need for abortion.

Contraception helps reduce unwanted pregnancies, but will not eliminate them. More than half of the 80 million unwanted pregnancies that occur each year end in abortion - and half of those are performed in unsafe conditions. About 67,000 women die annually from complications of unsafe abortion, and thousands more are severely injured. Preventing these deaths and injuries would reduce maternal mortality by approximately 13 percent globally. Yet, even where abortion is legal, access is often limited by barriers imposed by health institutions; a shortage of skilled providers; and lack of information.

When women give birth, skilled birth attendance with ready referral to facilities that can provide good quality emergency obstetric care could reduce maternal mortality by over 50 percent. The absence of these services remains a major problem especially where populations are widely dispersed. Only two out of every three women living in the developing world today give birth with skilled assistance, and even fewer have access to essential obstetric care.

Finally, prevention and treatment of STIs, including HIV, is vital for both maternal and neonatal health. Women with pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) from untreated STIs are at higher risk of infertility and ectopic pregnancy, a condition that is fatal without skilled care. A recent study showed that HIV-positive women in South Africa were up to five times more likely to die of pregnancy-related causes than pregnant women not living with HIV. Educating women and men on preventing STIs through the use of male and female condoms and other safer sex practices, as well as diagnosis and treatment, would save lives and transform communities.

The integrated SRRH package I've just outlined is not simply a concept. It has proved to be an effective strategy for the improvement of maternal health. In Bangladesh, one of the poorest countries with high rates of maternal mortality, the success of a comprehensive SRRH initiative in the 1990s provides inspiration. Within five years of initiation, the percentage of women receiving check-ups and care prior to childbirth doubled from 26 percent to 56 percent. Use of emergency obstetric care rose by nearly 25 percent. Female life expectancy increased by two years. Maternal mortality dropped by 26 percent.

Fifteen years after the United Nations International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD), the Obama administration announced a Global Health Initiative that mirrors the ICPD SRRH approach which was adopted by Bangladesh. They, other donors, the U.N. Secretary General, and many nations are now increasing attention to MDG 5. But we must not try to play with only half the deck available. We must fully fund and implement the comprehensive sexual and reproductive health package, not only maternity care or only family planning or HIV prevention and treatment. Together, the elements of the SRRH package add up to far more than the sum of its parts. Its full implementation will not only achieve maternal health, but also secure health and human rights for generations.


Adrienne Germain is president of the International Women's Health Coalition.

 

 

That’s really a good news especially following Mothers day. However, the challenge today is not that we dont know what has to be done; or lack of resources ;it is how we do it in a country like India. It would be good if some Managerial aspects of implementing the ICPD SRRH approach are also shared.

Anuj Kumar on 2010-05-11

While I support the main tenants of the SRRH approach, I believe there are some factual errors in Ms. Germain’s article with respect to Bangladesh that need to be mentioned.

The Bangladesh data presented by Ms. Germain are either incorrect or of unknown origin.  For example, according to successive rounds of the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey, antenatal coverage for all births did not reach 50% until 2004, not 1995 as claimed by the author.  There was no nationally representative data on maternal mortality between 1990-95 in Bangladesh, so the decline of 26% over that period can’t be substantiated.  Likewise, there was no nationally representative information on the use of emergency obstetric care in the nineties (there was very little to be had in any event).  Female life expectancy has increased in Bangladesh in recent decades, but it was largely the result of falling infant and child mortality rather than maternal mortality. 

I would also take issue with Ms. Germain’s self-serving claim that the success Bangladesh has achieved in maternal health can be attributed to the adoption of an SRRH strategy in the early nineties (the acronym had not even been invented by then).  The country was already making impressive strides in FP/RH as well as maternal and child health prior to the 1994 ICPD paradigm shift.  In fact, the take-off years for family planning and child survival programs in Bangladesh occurred in the late seventies and eighties. 

Much of the Bangladesh success story can traced to effective collaboration between the country’s public sector and a vibrant NGO community.  This pluralistic approach to the provision of health services started from the very earliest days of Bangladesh’s independence from Pakistan in 1971 (and the 1974 famine), not the adoption of non-binding plans of action pertaining to civil society from UN jamboree conferences.   

I am accustomed to advocates playing free and loose with numbers (which often go unreferenced), but you should consider requiring authors to state the source of their information.  If nothing else, you should hire a few fact-checkers for future editions of your magazine. 

And you also might want to employ a grammar-checker as well.  The title of Ms. Germain’s article should be Achieving Maternal Health: Getting Farther, Faster - not further, as in furthermore.

Andrew Kantner

Andrew Kantner on 2010-05-16

Maternal mortality remains unacceptably high in Bangladesh.  The 2001 Bangladesh Maternal Health Services and Mortality Survey reported a national maternal mortality ratio of 322 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births.  By 2007, only 13.6% of all deliveries were occurring in medical facilities offering some modicum of modern obstetric care.  These findings don’t provide any cause for celebration or triumphal affirmation of the saliency of SRRH approaches. 

Andrew Kantner

Andrew Kantner on 2010-05-20

While I am very appreciateive of the critical support for this topic that the MDG’s has engendered, and there has been tremendous improvement, this approach has also led to declines.  As Linda P. Fried and Lynn P. Freedman presented in this journal previously, the emphasis on outcomes and outcome tracking has failed to address many of the “upstream” factors so resistant to health development in many countries.  I agree with the earlier commenter, Anuj Kumar, who called for the introduction of managerial aspects of implementation.  So much of what is critical is missed in the overarching evaluations of progress being implemented now by organizations like the WHO.  Where is the investment in smaller scale Quality Improvement style programs? 

In Mongolia, a whole host of initiatives have been implemented that have been “lauded” for their success in decreasing maternal mortality.  However, with one or two notable exceptions, nobody has examined aspects of the process that have been critical to this success.  When they have, what becomes clear is that there has been no improvement in many areas of maternal/child healthcare.  Initiatives like the recently implemented plan to control infection there, limiting access to facilities to the mother alone, has actually led to a decrease in provider accountability.  A lack of focus on reporting oversight for providers has created an environment where there are few to no incentives to report medical complications/problems.  Until programs begin to be able to target the upstream capacity logjams, these disincentives to effectively monitor will always lead to unrealisitcally positive “outcomes”.

Sean Armstrong on 2010-06-01

I want to agree with you entirely. Lack of knowledge and women’s lack of perception of their own vulnerability to maternal death is what is killing most women. Women do not need glamourous five star hospitals—they need clean, well equipped health facilities that are within reach and sensitive to their needs.

Dr. Chrissie P.N. Kaponda on 2010-06-08

What happen when a poor country could not increase the health budget every year and the needs are arising so much. I agree that these deaths are preventable but not to many people including health workers   think in that way and the system is focus in just cure the ills.

Efrain Vigil on 2010-06-08

Women just need access, opportunities, proactive health workers and the political will . Is it so difficult and expensive?

Efrain Vigil on 2010-06-08

women need quality,access to the right information and skilled personel which is affordable,accessible and acceptable

farhiya ahmed on 2010-06-12

Hi am from Odissa,India. Prevention of maternal mortality can only be possible by combined effort of government, efficient health personals,ngos,public health experts and moreover the cooperation of the society

dr debashis mishra on 2011-01-14

This is a wonderful effort aimed at addressing maternal health issues. I’d like to know more through this medium in order for my NGO to be able to do more in matters relating to maternal health.

Mustapha Hanafi-Idiaro on 2011-04-04

hello friends. i am from Cameroon.prevention of maternal death during delivery can be done by sensitizing the public on how to go about during pregnancy and even training people in such areas even for free just to be able to manage the situation at the first stage before bringing to the health clinic for proper intervention.in this way i think it can be reduced or even stopped. thanks

teke thomas toh on 2011-08-09